I don't like how I feel
I can't recall actually becoming angry like this before. Not over an election.
I know I feel differently about this election than I have ever felt before. I actually felt it necessary for me to change my voter registration.
I was born into a family of Republicans. Heck, my mother voted for Eisenhower and then immediately went into labor. I was born at 11:04 pm on 11/04/1952. The same day Dwight was elected into office.
My parents are Republicans, both sets of my grandparents were Republicans.
But we were not an overtly political family. We didn't have political discussions around the dinner table. I don't recall my parents ever really talking about a presidential candidate as I was growing up.
When I turned18 and registered to vote, I registered as a Republican. I voted for Nixon in 1972. But I did all that because I was not really aware of the political process and I just registered Republican, because I had been born Republican.
But after that 1972 election, I started paying more attention to politics. I started to develop my own ideas about things instead of just going along with the flow. When 1976 came along, I voted for Ford over Carter. He turned out to be the last Republican I ever voted for for President. When 1980 rolled around, I had changed my registration to unaffiliated and I voted for John Anderson. Since then, my presidential vote has gone to the Democratic candidate. But I never felt the need to change my registration because I have voted for some Republicans in other races and never wanted to align myself with a particular party. I just didn't feel it was something I needed to do. Until now.
This year, for the first time in my life, I have registered as a Democrat.
I'm not sure why, but I think I need to make a statement. Maybe not a statement to anyone else, but certainly a statement to myself. This year, the stakes are just too high.
George Bush has got to go. He has squandered our military resources in this useless exercise in Iraq. He has sqaundered our good relations with most of the civilized world. He has not concentrated on destroying the real terrorists who threaten our country. He is damaging our economy that boasted a surplus when he came into office. He is destroying jobs. He is not working to improve health care. He is arrogant, and he has surrounded himself with people who do not have the best of interests of this country at heart.
I find myself actually hating the man. I can't help it, but that is the way I feel. And I have never felt this way before about a candidate for elective office.
Possibly my hate is developing because I see the momentum for his election growing and Kerry's diminishing. Maybe I'm just frustrated. I hope I can change how I feel, especially if Bush is re-elected, because it is no fun feeling this way.



9 Comments:
If you don't vote for the leaders of the Republicans, the Presidential candidate, you aren't a Republican anyway.
Now that you know you are a Democrat, help them nominate a winner next time. Kerry's faults are too many to list here; but just contrast him with Truman, a man who doesn't have the stones to Nuke our enemies can't win during this war.
You comment system is flaky, should I repost?
Horray! I too, registered Republican (1974) the party that freed the slaves, started the first social welfare program in the world, and was founded on the basic tenants of seperation of church and state (1854) The Republican party was also the party that got us out of Vietnam and promised to never lead us into another unnecessary war, but just last week I changed my voter registration to Democrat.
Under the lead of Bush and the Neocons, the Republican Party has abandoned everything it once proudly stood for and has abandoned its party faithful. Most of these modern day Republicans don't even know what the party values are and their ignorance has cost us our party. After all, it is called the Republican Party, not the George Bush Party.
Tin soldiers and Bush is coming.
America all alone.
War for oil, the Neocons drumming,
a thousand dead in old Iraq.
A thousand dead in old Iraq...
How many more?
"... the party that freed the slaves... and promised to never lead us into another unnecessary war..."
How did Lincoln free the slaves?
How did Bush free the Afghans?
How did Bush free the Iraqis?
Is freedom "unnecessary"?
Should you be my slave?
Would I let you vote?
Would you find it "unnecessary" to fight me when I whipped your wife and children?
Even though you included it in your post, you seem to have ignored one very important word Billy used when it came to referring to war. "Unnecessary". That is the key.
Was Lincoln's response to the seccession of the southern states the proper one? Hindsight tells us yes, he had to engage in war to preserve the union.
Was Bush's response to 9/11 the correct one? Current events and hindsight give us a resounding no. Taking out Saddam has not made us safer from terrorism, in fact it probably has just the opposite effect.
And you asked, "How did Bush free the Iraqis?" Remember, Bush did not go to war in Iraq to free the Iraqi people. He went to there to make us safer. A huge failure.
$25,000
That was certainly a cryptic response.
"Taking out Saddam has not made us safer from terrorism"
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/03/25/1017004766310.html?oneclick=true
Who is us? Saddam is a terrorist, he paid $25,000 per splodeydope, by check.
If we let him kill Jewish kids this year he gains the right by precedent to blow up your kids next year.
KERRY 2001: "...Saddam Hussein is essentially out of sync with the times. He is and has acted like a terrorist. And he is engaged in activities that are unacceptable."
Your anger comes because you have decided to accept the unnaceptable.
Post a Comment
<< Home